Take only what you need: fish coral reefs for food, not profit

By Tyson Martin

Increasing demand for fish is resulting in smaller and fewer fish in the oceans. For island communities that rely almost entirely on fresh caught fish for their protein, this is very bad news. But little is known about whether their own subsistence fishing practices (fishing using traditional methods for immediate consumption) are harming the ecosystems they rely so heavily upon.

a fishing vessel

Subsistence fishermen at Ailuk

Lying in the middle of the North Pacific, the Marshall Islands provided an ideal opportunity to find out how subsistence fishing affects fish communities.

Most atolls are either commercially fished, or have small communities that still live pretty much as they did hundreds of years ago, relying on freshly caught fish from the ocean to feed their families. However, a few atolls have been uninhabited by people for the last 60-odd years following nuclear testing, giving us a near pristine baseline to compare fishing impacts against.

Fig1_map_revised_01032017

Map of the Marshall Islands and three atolls we surveyed

To examine the effects of subsistence fishing, we counted reef fish around three atolls each with different levels of fishing impacts; commercial (Majuro), subsistence (Ailuk); and near pristine (Rongelap).

We found that as expected, the commercially fished atoll (Majuro) had 70% fewer top predators (sharks etc.) than atolls that were either unfished or fished only for subsistence. Interestingly though, the commercially fished atoll also had the highest overall fish population by weight (biomass), presumably due to relaxed predation from the large fish and sharks removed by fisherman.

The fish communities around subsistence fished atolls were hardly different from the unfished or near pristine atoll.

Our new research suggests that just because a reef has high fish biomass, it may not necessarily be in great condition, and we also need to make sure that both predators and their prey are present in the correct proportions.

Img_for_blog

Differences in fish communities between atolls. Predators were abundant on the subsistence (Ailuk) and near-pristine (Rongelap) atolls, whereas herbivore abundance was unusually high on the commercially fished (Majuro) atoll.

Additionally, we recommend that when faced with the opportunity to begin or increase the commercial capture and export of fish, island nations should remember that subsistence fishing by locals may not only provide food, but also keep reefs in an almost pristine condition. These reefs could then be used to generate other income through ventures such as ecotourism.

We suggest that in some cases where the human footprint is slight, coral reefs can have their fish, and we can eat them too.

This work appeared in ICES Journal of Marine Science

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s